I9 9900k vs

I9 9900k vs DEFAULT
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 X Review5 %FarC5 16%, BFV 3%, Witcher3 2%, Civ6 0%, ACO 11%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 16%, Wolf2 1%SotTR 2%, Rage2 2% 05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 X Review5 %FarC5 16%, BFV 3%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 2%, Civ6 0%, ACO 11%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 16%, Wolf2 1%SotTR 2% 21 May20|Optimum Tech
Intel iK Review - 6-core Ga13 %FarC5 25%, OverW 10%, SotTR 22%, RDR2 8%, StarWJFO 12%, CSGO 14%R6S 2% 14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 X review9 %Hitm2 8%, FarC5 23%, TWarW2 10%, SotTR 20%, ACO 8%, MetroEx 3%, MESoW 11%, Divis2 3%StrangeB 4% 28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of So Far (Gaming, 18 % OCSotTR 18% OC 28 May20|Gamers Nexus
Best CPUs of So Far (Gaming, 10 %Hitm2 5%, SotTR 14%, F 13% 30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel iKS Review: Overclocki20 % OCTWarW2 32% OC, F 10% OC, GTAV 17% OC 30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel iKS Review: Overclocki18 %Hitm2 18%, TWarW2 28%, F 13%, GTAV 11%, SotTR 19% 07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today4 %SotTR 12%, BFV 17%, MetroEx 9%CSGO 0%, R6S 18% 10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S8 %BFV 9%, SotTR 7%, MetroEx 7%, Divis2 7%
Sours: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-iK-vs-AMD-RyzenX/vs

Intel Core iT vs Intel Core iK

Intel Core iT

&#; remove from comparison

The Intel Core iT is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core iK, the T offers lower clock speeds ( - GHz versus - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core iK and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics graphics card is clocked at up to GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel Core iK

&#; remove from comparison

The Intel Core iK is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. At the time of announcement in late , the K is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU and offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking. The CPU integrates 8 cores (16 threads) clocked at - 5 GHz and it needs a new Z based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is up to 25 % faster than the older Core iK. The single thread performance is only slightly faster due to the higher clock speeds. As a high end desktop CPU, the iK is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics graphics card is clocked at up to GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to Watt and higher.

show full text

Intel Core iTIntel Core iK
Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Coffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
- MHz - MHz
KB KB
2 MB2 MB
16 MB16 MB
8 / 168 / 16
35 95
14++ 14++
mm2 mm2
°C °C
FCLGAFCLGA
Dual-Channel DDR Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics ( - MHz)Intel UHD Graphics ( - MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$ U.S.$ U.S.
Intel Coffee Lake iTIntel Coffee Lake iK

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - iT

pt (48%)

AMD Ryzen 5 -4%

Intel Core iU -4%

Intel Core iU -4%

Intel Core iNG7 -2%

Intel Core iH -2%

Intel Core iU -2%

Intel Core iG -1%

AMD Ryzen 5 U -1%

Intel Core iG7 -1%

AMD Ryzen 5 1%

Intel Core iH 2%

Intel Core iG7 2%

Intel Core iK 3%

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO U 3%

AMD Ryzen 5 U 3%

Intel Core iH 4%

Intel Core iU 4%

Intel Core iF 4%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO WX %

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - iK

pt (65%)

Intel Core iH -7%

Intel Core iH -7%

AMD Ryzen 7 U -7%

Intel Core iH -6%

Intel Core iF -5%

AMD Ryzen 5 H -4%

Intel Core iHK -4%

Intel Xeon WM -2%

Intel Core iH 0%

AMD Ryzen 7 X 1%

AMD Ryzen 7 H 2%

Intel Core iK 2%

Intel Core iH 3%

Intel Core iKS 4%

AMD Ryzen 9 HS 4%

Intel Core iHK 4%

Intel Core i 5%

Intel Core iK 5%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO WX 54%

Points (68%)

min:      avg:      median: (78%)     max: Points

Points (11%)

min:      avg:      median: (21%)     max: Points

Points (11%)

min:      avg:      median: (20%)     max: Points

Points (68%)

min:      avg:      median: (78%)     max: Points

Points (23%)

min:      avg:      median: (39%)     max: Points

Points (67%)

min:      avg:      median: (76%)     max: Points

(60%)

min:      avg:      median: (71%)     max:

(51%)

min:      avg:      median: (79%)     max:

min:      avg:      median: (61%)     max: Points

min:      avg:      median: (72%)     max: Points

s (2%)

min:      avg:      median: (1%)     max: s

s (1%)

min:      avg: 4     median: (1%)     max: s

(39%)

min:      avg:      median: (49%)     max:

MIPS (25%)

min:      avg:      median: (34%)     max: MIPS

MIPS (70%)

min:      avg:      median: (78%)     max: MIPS

fps (32%)

min:      avg:      median: (52%)     max: fps

fps (51%)

min:      avg:      median: (77%)     max: fps

fps (12%)

Sours: https://www.notebookcheck.net/iT-vs-iK__html
  1. Kitchenaid mixer accessories
  2. Deck railing rope
  3. Ocean color palette hex

AMD Ryzen 9 X vs Intel Core iK

63 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 9 X

Intel Core iK

Why is AMD Ryzen 9 X better than Intel Core iK?

  • x faster CPU speed?
    12 x GHzvs8 x GHz
  • MHz higher ram speed?
    MHzvsMHz
  • 8 more CPU threads?
    24vs16
  • 4MB bigger L2 cache?
    6MBvs2MB
  • 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs14nm
  • x higher PassMark result?
    vs
  • 48MB bigger L3 cache?
    64MBvs16MB
  • KB bigger L1 cache?
    KBvsKB

Why is Intel Core iK better than AMD Ryzen 9 X?

  • GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5GHzvsGHz
  • 10W lower TDP?
    95WvsW
  • % higher PassMark result (single)?
    vs
  • 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    °Cvs95°C
  • % higher single-core Geekbench 5 result?
    vs
  • Has NX bit?
  • Has integrated graphics?

Cheap alternatives

General info

A bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run bit apps.

Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance.

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.

Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) is a high-speed interface standard for connecting components, such as graphics cards and SSDs, to a motherboard. Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance.

If the CPU exceeds the maximum operating temperature then problems such as random resets can occur.

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

8.number of transistors

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core iK)

A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor.

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

Performance

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core iK)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core iK)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Features

1.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 9 X

✔Intel Core iK

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

2.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 9 X

✔Intel Core iK

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

4.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core iK)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

Multithreading technology (such as Intel's Hyperthreading or AMD's Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor's physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 9 X

✔Intel Core iK

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 9 X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core iK)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

Benchmarks

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, )

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, )

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro WX

AMD Ryzen Threadripper X

AMD Ryzen Threadripper X

AMD Ryzen Threadripper X

AMD Ryzen Threadripper X

Show all
This page is currently only available in English.
Sours: https://versus.com/en/amd-ryzenx-vs-intel-core-ik
9900K vs. Threadripper in Video Editing - What's Faster?

AMD Ryzen 9 X vs. Intel Core iK

The period between late and early was an inflection point in the ongoing battle between AMD and Intel. In late , Intel continued its dominance in the gaming space by releasing the iK, which was the first CPU outside of Intel&#;s Extreme range to sport the i9 marker. AMD followed up shortly after with the Ryzen 9 X. Although AMD had been competitive in productivity apps in its two previous Ryzen generations, the X proved that team red still has the power to go up against Intel.

The X marks a return for AMD, but that doesn&#;t necessarily mean it&#;s better than the K. Let&#;s dig into the details to find the better CPU.

By the numbers

AMD Ryzen 9 x

Only eclipsed by its core sibling, the Ryzen 9 X is an extremely powerful mainstream CPU packing fantastic specifications. The Core iK is no slouch, however, and by the numbers, they&#;re pretty comparable.

Intel Core i9 KAMD Ryzen 9 X
Process node14nm7nm
Cores812
Threads1624
L2/L3 cache2MB/16MB6MB/64MB
Base clock speedGHzGHz
Boost clock speedGHz (all cores)
5GHz (one core)
GHz+ (all cores)
GHz (one core)
GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics No
TDP95ww

The X has more cores and threads, while Intel&#;s chip has the stronger clock speed, especially when it comes to single-threaded workloads. Most games now use a handful of cores, so unless you&#;re overclocking, you won&#;t typically see 5GHz frequencies when gaming on a K.

The X can boost to GHz on a single core, but will be closer to GHz if using all cores and threads at the same time. AMD&#;s automated overclocking can take it up to GHz in some cases, though it&#;s very much dependent on your motherboard, BIOS revision, and cooling.

The X has seen a major increase in instructions per clock over its second-generation predecessors, so it&#;s more powerful than the K clock for clock. Its huge L2 and L3 cache effectively eliminate the memory latency concerns from the 2nd-generation chips, too.

Gaming

Intel Core i9- K

Intel has held a performance edge in gaming for more than a decade, and even with AMD&#;s fantastic first- and second-generation Ryzen CPUs, that held true. But no longer.

In our gaming tests with Fortnite, Civilization VI, and Assassin&#;s Creed Odyssey, the X beat out the K &#; a CPU previously hailed as the best gaming chip ever made &#; on almost all settings, showing a slight lead. That might not be the crushing numbers that AMD fans hoped for, but this is the first time in more than 10 years that a high-end AMD CPU beat the Intel competition in gaming.

The X showed a decent lead in 3DMark, while in Assassin&#;s Creed Odyssey, it matched the K on high settings and exceed it on low settings. In Fortnite, the K shot ahead of the X with high settings, but with over fps in all of our tests, that difference hardly matters.

We saw the most drastic difference in Civilization VI. Across high and low settings, the X beat the K. Most grand strategy games stress the CPU more than the GPU, as the processor handles A.I.-driven opponents and multiple interconnected systems. As with Fortnite, both processors delivered above fps across our trials. AMD&#;s edge in both tests &#; not in a single test, as was the case with Fortnite &#; shows its capability as a gaming CPU.

Price is an important factor, though. Although the K was more expensive than the X at launch, it&#;s cheaper now (a new position for Intel). You can commonly find a K for around $ The X is closer to its launch price, selling for around $

That&#;s if you can find one in stock. The X is back-ordered at most retailers as of March The XT may be more readily available depending on where you shop, and it&#;s almost identical to the X. The XT variant is clocked MHz faster out of the box, but that&#;s the only difference. AMD replaced the X with the X in The X is still available, though we expect AMD to start phasing it out soon.

The K is almost two generations old, with Intel gearing up to launch the its 11th-gen Rocket Lake processors. Given the massive price cut, we expect Intel has already shipped its remaining stock to retailers. If you want a K new, it&#;s best to pick one up now.

It is important to consider the ongoing problems Intel faces with CPU performance hindered by Spectre mitigation, too. Those may continue as new bugs are found in the future, whereas AMD&#;s chips are typically more robust against these kinds of exploits.

Productivity

Heavily multithreaded productivity tasks like video transcoding and editing have been more AMD&#;s wheelhouse for the past couple of years, with its Ryzen and Threadripper chips competing directly and even pulling ahead of Intel&#;s more expensive options. With the series, and specifically the core, thread X, AMD has beaten not only Intel&#;s mainstream chips (the K included) but will even put some of its older Threadripper cousins out to pasture.

At E3 , AMD provided statistics of its X pitted against one that&#;s more than twice the price: The core, thread, $1, Intel Core iX. And it still cleaned up.

When we received the X for testing, we pitted it against its true rival: The K. Unsurprisingly, the new AMD CPU proved dominant once again.

In Geekbench and Cinebench, the X decimated the K in multithreaded performance, though its reduced clock speed meant it fell just shy of the Intel competition in single-threaded tasks. In the real world Handbrake 4K transcoding test, the X proved almost 25% faster than the K &#; a sizable advantage delivered by the extra cores/threads of the AMD chip.

Efficiency

Efficiency isn&#;t as important on desktop chips as it is with laptops, as there&#;s no battery life to consider. But heat is an important factor, and the more power a CPU requires, the more heat it outputs. That&#;s where the somewhat marketing-driven TDP figure comes from.

By the numbers, Intel&#;s K is the more efficient chip, with a rated TDP of 95 watts, while the X has a TDP of watts. But that&#;s not the full story. Intel&#;s TDP ratings tend to relate to its base clock rather than its sustained boost. AMD&#;s are much closer to the power it pulls when at its highest clock speeds.

Research into power demands from Intel&#;s K around its launch showed it drawing far more power than its TDP rating. Tom&#;s Hardware reported that while it remained under its TDP during gaming, it could require more than watts when doing heavily multithreaded workloads over prolonged periods. That number could increase to watts if overlocked.

We didn&#;t test the X&#;s power draw, but other reviewers have, and Anandtech found it never pulled more than watts when fully loaded. That makes it a more efficient chip than the K too. And that&#;s AMD&#;s big selling point with its Zen architecture: More performance per watt.

The X is the new CPU king

AMD Ryzen 9 x

We were excited for the X before it launched based on prerelease numbers and speculation. Now we can report that after tests, we’re even happier.

In our tests, we found the X rivals the K performance in most gaming and limited-thread tasks, even though Intel has long held the top spot in the gaming world. However, when it came to multithreaded workloads, the X outperformed the competition. Another benefit: Users will be able to use a smaller cooler on their overall setup because the X’s TDP is lower. 

This is a major accomplishment by AMD; the X is an excellent mainstream CPU. We haven’t seen performance levels like this from AMD since their Athlon This success has pushed Intel to play a defensive role &#; it has lowered prices and has a new generation of even-faster CPUs to combat AMD’s best.

Between the two, the X is a clear winner. That said, both processors are dated at this point. Intel&#;s more recent K is much better than the K, and the upcoming K should blow the X away. Similarly, AMD&#;s recent Ryzen chips perform much better than their predecessors.

Editors&#; Recommendations

Sours: https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/amd-ryzenx-vs-intel-core-ik/

9900k vs i9

AMD Ryzen 9 X vs Intel Core iK: Which CPU Is Better?

With AMD’s recent release of the new Zen 2 architecture and Ryzen series processors, the CPU landscape has seen a paradigm shift. In the past, Intel took the performance crown with a higher price point, while AMD was typically the value proposition and behind in overall performance. But AMD has caught up and, in many respects, surpassed Intel on performance, while retaining the price advantage per core and thread. Given that, which high-end CPU to choose may seem like an easy choice, but in reality, things are a bit more complicated.

We’ll put AMD’s new core Ryzen 9 X (the company’s current flagship, at least until the core Ryzen 9 X arrives in September) up against Intel’s top mainstream part, the Core iK in a number of categories below, to help you decide which one is right for your high-end computing needs. If you're looking for a broader selection of chip comparisons, you can also head to our CPU Benchmark Hierarchy.

We’ll take a look at high-level features, available motherboards, overclocking, power consumption, gaming performance, productivity and value to determine which is the better CPU. But while these battles will certainly shed some light on the situation, in the end the right answer for you will depend on your desires and what, exactly, you’ll be doing with your new processor.

Features

AMD’s Ryzen 9 X is a core thread processor with a GHz base clock and the ability to turbo (AMD calls it Precision Boost 2) up to GHz, while slotting into a W TDP. The CPU is technically the second processor in the product stack, behind the previously-mentioned X. Both CPUs blur the lines between mainstream and HEDT systems, as the Intel i9 did previously. The new CPU 7nm architecture (manufactured by TSMC), down from 12nm Zen+ and 14nm Zen on previous Ryzen chips, is part of what provides the notable improvements with AMD’s new CPUs.

In addition to the process node shrink, Zen 2 improves upon memory speed support, raising its base spec to DDR from the previous version’s support of DDR (Zen+/Ryzen ) and DDR (Zen/ original Ryzen). Where Zen and Zen+ were a bit more limited in speed, we’ve seen support on X motherboards reaching into the DDR range. Reaching these speeds is not a guarantee, however, and relies on a good integrated memory controller (IMC), motherboard, and a compatible memory kit. Under sub-ambient cooling we have seen memory paired with Ryzen CPUs reach DDR4 +, in fact. AMD recommends a more realistic speed of DDR4 , though.

One of the other changes with Zen 2 and the X chipset is the implementation of PCIe The new Zen 2 CPUs and Xbased motherboards’ upgrade from PCIe (the speed of both AMD’s previous-gen motherboard chipsets, as well as all current Intel boards) doubles the bandwidth from 32 GBps to 64 GBps. This change can help with storage and content creation, but at the moment it has no perceivable impact on gaming performance, as bandwidth isn’t currently saturated with today’s graphics cards.

Intel Core iKAMD Ryzen 9 X
ArchitectureCoffee LakeZen 2
SocketAM4
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 24
Base Frequency (GHz)
Boost Frequency (Active Cores - GHz)1/2 Cores - /4 Cores - Cores - (1 Core)
L3 Cache (MB)1664
Process14nm++7nm
TDP (Watts)95
Memory Speed (official)DDRDDR
Memory ControllerDual-ChannelDual-Channel
Integrated UHD GraphicsGT2 - Up to MHzNo
Recommended Customer Pricing$$

The Intel Core iK processor jumps into the ring at a 50% core count disadvantage bringing its eight-core, thread capabilities up against the similarly-priced X. Clock speeds on the iK start off a bit lower with a base speed of GHz (vs. GHz), but Intel’s turbo functionality brings it to GHz for two cores, which are well past AMD’s peak turbo spec. Single-threaded application performance will generally side with Intel when it’s allowed to boost fully, due to the higher clock speeds.

Base memory support on the Coffee Lake-based CPUs is DDR, which is much lower than Zen 2 base spec. That said, Intel-based systems (with compatible boards) are able to generally reach memory speeds approaching MHz (or more with good IMC/board/memory). With similar speeds reachable with the Ryzen 9 X and an X board, memory support specifically is closer to a tie than it seems.

AMD also offers its capable Ryzen Master software, which allows for fine-grained control of the processor. You also get free access to its Precision Boost Overdrive feature, which uses sophisticated real-time algorithms to dynamically overclock your processor based upon chip quality, your cooling solution, motherboard capabilities, and power supply’s ability to feed the motherboard. That wrings the utmost in performance out of the chip, and all with one click of the button.

Intel also recently unveiled its Performance Maximizer software, which automatically overclocks your processor (9th-Gen K-Series models only), but in comparison, it is far less sophisticated than AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive. While AMD’s implementation is dynamic and can react to different types of workloads and environmental conditions on the fly, Intel’s software sets a static profile that dictates performance regardless of changes to your system. It also only applies to Intel’s priciest chips, while AMD’s suite comes with every SKU.

AMD also ships all of its processors with a bundled cooler, while Intel doesn’t provide a cooler with it’s pricey K-series chips. In the case of the Ryzen 9 X, you get a Wraith Prism RGB cooler (yes, it comes with RGB bling) that can more than sufficiently handle the chips heat output at stock, and even grants some limited overclocking headroom, too.

Winner: AMD

With IPC performance being similar, AMD rules the roost here with a higher core count, better power efficiency at stock, a faster base memory spec, as well as bringing PCIe While the latter doesn’t matter much (if anything) performance-wise for gaming, new PCIe M.2 drives will offer much-faster sequential speeds. AMD’s 12 cores and 24 threads for a similar price as Intel’s 8/16 offering is certainly compelling for buyers who can utilize that much parallel compute.

Motherboard Options

With Zen 2’s release, AMD brought forth a new chipset in X, allowing users access to PCIe , as well as a generally more robust power delivery capable of driving the entire lineup, including the yet-to-be-released flagship core, thread Ryzen 9 X.

Pricing on the X boards ranges from around $ to over $, which on the high end is a notable increase over X flagships. Overall, X motherboard pricing has gone up mainly due to the more robust VRMs as well as the PCIe re-drivers and other bits that enable PCIe support. It is particularly impressive that AMD, once known as being the value alternative to Intel, is now leading the industry by blazing a path to the ultra-speedy PCIe interface.

Features wise, the X boards also include native USB Gen2 (10 Gbps) support and more capable power delivery designed to better support the new chips, particularly while overclocking.

X aside, one of the selling points of the new Ryzen CPUs is backward compatibility with previous-generation chipsets. Support goes all the way back to B, in fact. This move allows users who don’t care about PCIe support to save money by using the same motherboard and dropping in a Zen 2-based CPU, or buying a “new” board with an older chipset for much less money.

In total between the five major AIBs (ASRock, Asus, Biostar, Gigabyte and MSI), users currently have thirty X boards to choose from. Each board partner has a full range of boards and feature sets from ITX to E-ATX, and covers a wide gamut of pricing and features.

On the Intel side, while X is brand-new, the Z chipset has been out for nearly a year. With the Z chipset came with native support for Coffee Lake-based CPUs as well as USB Gen2 (10 Gbps) support, Wireless-AC 2x2 MHz WiFi, and uses the PCIe specification.

Most Z boards are capable of driving the iK--at least at stock settings.

Between the same five board partners, there are 58 boards to choose from just on Z This does not include Z or the lesser chipsets in B and H (which can’t be used for CPU overclocking).

Winner: Intel

Both CPU companies’ latest motherboards offer similar feature sets, including overclocking and native USB Gen 2 support. Though X has PCIe , this doesn’t matter at this time for gaming, though it does allow for faster storage. Pricing, on average, is going to be higher for the X chipsets boards. As time goes on, prices will likely go down on that front, and we expect to see more X board models hit the market as well. The nod goes to Intel for now due to an overall cheaper price range and higher overclocking potential, along with partial integration of Wireless-AC, something that isn’t part of X

Overclocking Potential

Both the AMD and Intel CPUs support overclocking, though how each company handles that in the product stack are different. On one hand, all AMD Ryzen processors are unlocked from the factory, while Intel limits overclocking to the more expensive K-variants and “Z” chipsets. AMD on the other hand allows overclocking a bit further down the product stack to its B chipset.

Intel over the last couple of generations has been able to reach a higher peak overclock when using ambient cooling methods (sub-ambient as well). The iK peaks somewhere around the GHz mark with adequate cooling using all cores and threads. This amounts to a - GHz overclock from the base frequency. Some samples can reach another MHz above 5 GHz, but that’s not as common. Reaching that high may require delidding to keep the temperatures under control, even though the CPU uses solder thermal interface material (sTIM) between the die and IHS.

Since Ryzen hit the scene, the 7nm process itself seems to get in the way of high clock speeds, placing what feels like a hard ceiling on ambient overclocks. Though new, from what we have seen in our review as well as others on the web, the Ryzen 9 X tops out around GHz (Give or take MHz) when manually overclocking all cores. From base clock to fully overclocked, that is a mere MHz increase. AMD seems to push these CPUs about as far as they can go out of the box with its built-in Precision Boost overclocking.

The Intel CPUs tend to yield a more significant performance increase in most tasks, where overclocking a Ryzen CPU doesn’t offer a whole lot in the way of noticeable performance gains due to the Precision Boost technology already pushing the CPU to its performance limits (assuming you have a capable motherboard and cooler) at stock.

Winner: Intel

The Intel CPUs reach a much higher peak overclock speed as well as gaining more performance in the process. The iK wins this round, hands down, with easily better overclocking potential.

Gaming Performance

For many, how a CPU performs in games has long been a measure for how a CPU performs, period. In the past, AMD CPUs were always lagging behind at p at times (and in specific games) by a significant margin. With the release of Zen 2 and its increased cache size, which AMD markets as “gaming cache,” AMD tried to close that gap, and was quite successful in doing so.

The X, when allowed to stretch its legs with Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO), significantly outperforms the previous-generation Ryzen 7 X, and in many cases is just a few to several frames per second (fps) behind the iK. This change yields an average of % performance difference between the two CPUs in our testing.

Image 1 of 14
Image 2 of 14
Image 3 of 14
Image 4 of 14
Image 5 of 14
Image 6 of 14
Image 7 of 14
Image 8 of 14
Image 9 of 14
Image 10 of 14
Image 11 of 14
Image 12 of 14
Image 13 of 14
Image 14 of 14

Intel has been the leader in gaming performance for decades. Team blue’s IPC (instructions per cycle) and higher speeds have typically yielded superior performance over the AMD CPUs. And for the most part, that hasn’t changed, though Intel’s lead has shrunk significantly.

When the iK is manually overclocked to 5 GHz, that lead increases to an average of % across all our tested titles. As it stands, many games simply cannot utilize the extra cores and threads the X has to offer and rely more on clock speeds and IPC performance. In time that may change, but for now higher clocks still rule the p gaming world. But as we’ve said many times before, once you step above that resolution, gaming performance tends to even out as the graphics card becomes the bottleneck.

Winner: Intel

AMD has most certainly narrowed the gap in p gaming performance with Zen 2 when running the CPU at stock speeds, and the company is even able to perform better than the ik in a few CPU-heavy titles. But in the end, Intel’s i9 CPU allows high-end GPU’s to stretch their legs the most. While the difference at stock speeds isn’t noticeable for many, those who are running high-refresh monitors and looking to extract every frame possible out of their system will want to use the K, especially when overclocked.

Productivity Performance

On the productivity side of things, AMD and the X really show their strengths. From web to MS Office, the x beats even the 5 GHz iK in much of our testing. Only in the video conferencing, photo editing, and spreadsheet work does the Intel CPU take the lead.

Image 1 of 26
Image 2 of 26
Image 3 of 26
Image 4 of 26
Image 5 of 26
Image 6 of 26
Image 7 of 26
Image 8 of 26
Image 9 of 26
Image 10 of 26
Image 11 of 26
Image 12 of 26
Image 13 of 26
Image 14 of 26
Image 15 of 26
Image 16 of 26
Image 17 of 26
Image 18 of 26
Image 19 of 26
Image 20 of 26
Image 21 of 26
Image 22 of 26
Image 23 of 26
Image 24 of 26
Image 25 of 26
Image 26 of 26

Outside of that and application startup (where clocks and IPC rule) anywhere the X can make use of its extra cores and threads, it performs better. This includes Corona, Blender, Luxmark, and Cinebench (multi-thread).

Image 1 of 8
Image 2 of 8
Image 3 of 8
Image 4 of 8
Image 5 of 8
Image 6 of 8
Image 7 of 8
Image 8 of 8

The AMD processor also handles encoding duties quite well. We saw it easily beating out the Intel offerings in 7Zip, Handbrake, VeraCrypt AES, and Geekbench. Intel and the Core iK do make a solid showing and flex its per-core performance advantage, though, in single-thread Geekbench, Cinebench R15, and Y-Cruncher.

Winner: AMD

Without a doubt, anywhere the Ryzen 9 X can use its cores and threads fully, it’s the better productivity based CPU. If the applications used are not heavily threaded, the iK shows off its prowess. As time goes on we should see an increase in core use by software, so the AMD CPU should have a longer lifespan in particular with multi-threaded applications.

Power Consumption

Sours: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9_x-vs-intel-core_ik,html
Intel i9-9900K vs i9-10900K // Test in 8 Games

Since they were sideways to us, it was clearly visible how the guy's penis, shiny with lubrication, either plunges to its. Full length, then reappears from the girlfriend's pussy. We stood in front of them a few steps away, rooted to the spot, watching the action. They did not immediately notice us, completely indulging in their feelings.

You will also be interested:

She wanted to spin, she turned around and: met with an open, cheerful and mischievous gaze of one of the guys. They had towels on their hips, bottles of gel in their hands, sparkles in their eyes, a smile on their lips, drops. Of clear, fresh water on their bodies. Widely, openly, in Gagarin style.



92 93 94 95 96